The itemized list of items taken from the property, which was released Friday at the Department of Justice’s request along with the accompanying warrant, includes one set of documents marked as “Various classified/TS/SCI documents,” which is an abbreviation that refers to top-secret/sensitive compartmented information. It also says agents recovered four sets of top secret documents, three sets of secret documents and three sets of confidential documents. The list, released by U.S. Magistrate Judge Bruce Reinhart on Friday along with the text of the warrant, does not include details on the subject matter of the documents. According to the search warrant, the alleged crimes under investigation are violations of the Espionage Act, which outlaws the unauthorized retention of national security information that could harm the United States or aid a foreign adversary; a federal law that makes it a crime to destroy or conceal a document in order to obstruct a government investigation; and another statute associated with unlawful removal of government materials. Punishment and fines upon conviction are assessed depending on the number of concealed or destroyed documents. Attorney General Merrick Garland announced Thursday that the Department of Justice would seek to unseal the warrant and itemized receipt of what was removed from the property after Trump disclosed the search and his lawyers provided reporters with details about what the FBI was looking for. Reinhart gave the Justice Department until 3 p.m. Eastern time to confer with Trump’s lawyers and inform the court whether he planned to contest unsealing the documents. Trump said on his Truth Social network late Thursday that he supporting unsealing the warrant. Within the 20 boxes removed in Monday’s search were binders of photos, a handwritten note, an executive grant of clemency for conservative provocateur Roger Stone and information about the “President of France.” The warrant allowed agents to search “the 45 Office,” and “storage rooms and all other rooms or areas within the premises used or available to be used by (the former president) and his staff and in which boxes or documents could be stored, including all structures or buildings on the estate.” The unprecedented court-approved search of a former president’s home, which Trump called a “raid,” set off a firestorm of criticism from Trump and his Republican allies who accused the Department of Justice of a “witch hunt” and demanded more information from top officials about why it took place. That continued Friday with Republicans on Capitol Hill saying they needed to see the underlying affidavit used to justify the search, something that normally would not become public unless charges were filed. Rep. Michael Turner, R-Ohio, told reporters Friday that the release of the warrant and inventory would still leave “unanswered questions.” “We are very concerned about the method that was used to raid Mar-a-Lago,” he said citing the length of the daylong search. Multiple news outlets reported Thursday that the Department of Justice had already used subpoenas and other “less intrusive” means to recover documents this spring, but sought the search warrant because it believed Trump still had confidential or top secret materials at Mar-a-Lago, including some related to nuclear programs. In a Truth Social post Friday morning, Trump suggested without any evidence that any recovered nuclear documents were planted by the FBI during their search of Mar-a-Lago earlier this week. In a separate post, he argued that former President Barack Obama kept 33 million pages of documents, including some that were classified. The National Archives and Records Administration pointed out in a statement that the documents are housed by the National Archives for the Obama Presidential Library. The results of Monday’s search could potentially affect Trump’s other legal issues, including the Department of Justice’s ongoing investigation into Trump’s attempts to use fake slates of electors to persuade lawmakers to overturn the 2020 election in his favor. It is unlikely that all of the contents of the 20 boxes of material removed from the estate Monday are classified. Some of the boxes could contain mementos and personal letters that Trump wanted to keep — something other former presidents have done — but some of the materials could also be personally, politically or legally damaging. Now that the materials are back in the government’s possession, Trump has no say in how they are used, including against him in court, said former federal prosecutor Neama Rahmani. “If there’s something in there that can be evidence of another crime, that’s fair game,” Rahmani said.